Your message dated Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:15:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#501422: qmtest: FTBFS in lenny: Nonexistent
build-dependency: python-happydoc
has caused the Debian Bug report #501422,
regarding qmtest: FTBFS in lenny: Nonexistent build-dependency: python-happydoc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
501422: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=501422
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qmtest
Version: 2.4-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20081006 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in a lenny chroot, your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.37.1), docbook-dsssl, docbook-xml, jadetex,
> python-all-dev (>= 2.4), python-central (>= 0.6), python-extclass (>=
> 1.2.0zope-2.5.1-1.3), python-happydoc, sgml-data, tidy
> Checking for already installed source dependencies...
> W: Unable to locate package python-happydoc
> debhelper: missing
> Using default version 7.0.15
> docbook-dsssl: missing
> docbook-xml: missing
> jadetex: missing
> python-all-dev: missing
> Using default version 2.5.2-2
> python-central: missing
> Using default version 0.6.8
> python-extclass: missing
> Using default version 1.2.0zope-2.5.1-6
> python-happydoc: missing
> sgml-data: missing
> tidy: missing
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> E: Couldn't find package python-happydoc
The full build log is available from:
http://newpeople.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2008/10/06
It is possible that your package builds fine in sid, but you should make sure
that your package also builds fine in lenny before the release.
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.4-3.1
Lucas Nussbaum schrieb:
> Package: qmtest
> Version: 2.4-3
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20081006 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in a lenny chroot, your package failed
> to build on i386.
this is already fixed in unstable
--- End Message ---
