On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 06:38:54PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Is there a reason not to upload an NMU (or even a MU) for this bug?
Ok, I'm uploading the attached debdiff to DELAYED/1
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
diff -u portmap-6.0/debian/changelog portmap-6.0/debian/changelog
--- portmap-6.0/debian/changelog
+++ portmap-6.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+portmap (6.0-6.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * urgency=high for RC bug closing.
+ * debian/init.d: use pidofproc to check portmap pid, so it check if portmap
+ is running by looking in /var/run/portmap.pid instead of running
+ processes. (finally) closes: #448470
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:33:35 +0100
+
portmap (6.0-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Acknowledge NMU; closes: #482740
diff -u portmap-6.0/debian/init.d portmap-6.0/debian/init.d
--- portmap-6.0/debian/init.d
+++ portmap-6.0/debian/init.d
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
case "$1" in
start)
log_begin_msg "Starting portmap daemon..."
- pid=`pidof portmap`
+ pid=pidofproc portmap
if [ -n "$pid" ] ; then
log_begin_msg "Already running."
log_end_msg 0
