severity 317365 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
I am not sure I can follow what the object of this report is,
and I certainly do not see why a serious priority is justified. What
exactly is the potential for litigation here in policy? The bug
number referenced offers no further explanations either.
From what I can gather, the objection in some sense seems to
be on the word "agreement". Not arguing the merits of that claim
(personally, I would like to see some better justification for all
this furor) -- the policy document does not include the word
agreement, so surely whatever the problem is, if any, it does not
warrant a serious bug on policy.
Secondly, I am not sure that Debian technical policy is the
proper mechanism to disseminate Legal advice to developers -- or even
best practice.
manoj
--
Anybody who doesn't cut his speed at the sight of a police car is
probably parked.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
