Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:38:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#503801: josm: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch has caused the Debian Bug report #503801, regarding josm: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 503801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503801 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: josm Version: 0.0.0.20080713-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: jbc-mismatch This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older jvms. Binary packages explicitely built with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6 must not depend on java-runtime{,1,2,5}{,-headless}, but only on java-runtime6{,-headless} or any of the non-virtual packages providing a java6 runtime. It is preferred to build the bytecode so that it runs on older jvms. This is done passing '-source 1.[45]' to javac (or for cdbs ant tasks setting ANT_OPTS to -Dant.build.javac.source=1.[45]. You usually can check for the java byte code with file(1), currently broken in testing/unstable, or use javap -verbose (a script checking the command line args (check-class-version) can be found at http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/. Both .class and .jar files found in the binary packages need to be checked. Note: this report may be a false positive, if all bytecode files have version 49 or less.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi, On Oct 28 09:26, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: josm > Version: 0.0.0.20080713-1 > Severity: serious > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: jbc-mismatch > > This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the > default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac > creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older > jvms. Binary packages explicitely built with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6 > must not depend on java-runtime{,1,2,5}{,-headless}, but only on > java-runtime6{,-headless} or any of the non-virtual packages providing > a java6 runtime. > [...] > Note: this report may be a false positive, if all bytecode files have > version 49 or less. I believe this is a false positive. josm does not depend on a java-runtime virtual package and builds with ant.build.javac.source=1.5. javap says that all bytecode files have version 49. Please re-open the bug in case i missed something and you still think the bug is valid. Regards, Andreas
--- End Message ---
