Your message dated Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:23:12 GMT
with message-id <200812131523.mbdfncdn012...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line xwhois has been removed from Debian, closing #507944
has caused the Debian Bug report #507944,
regarding xwhois: segfaults on start in get_servers()
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
507944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507944
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xwhois
Version: 0.4.2-8.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
the package containing file will generate segfault directly on start.
gdb doesn't give anty usefull data.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages xwhois depends on:
ii libc6 2.7-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libglib1.2ldbl 1.2.10-19 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-18.1 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 X11 client-side library
ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii libxi6 2:1.1.3-1 X11 Input extension library
xwhois recommends no packages.
xwhois suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.4.2-8.2+rm
The xwhois package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508609 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
