Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hi Luk, > > |--==> On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:09:59 +0100, Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> said: > > LC> Free Ekanayaka wrote: > >>Hi Asheesh, > >> > >>|--==> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:52:34 -0800 (PST), Asheesh Laroia > <ashe...@asheesh.org> said: > >> > AL> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > >>>>attached as debdiff.patch against -1 > >> > AL> Actually attached this time. Pardon the noise! > >> > >>Thanks for all your work, I will upload the package today. > >> > >>I'm also going to upgrade to version 0.116.1, which contains several > >>important bug fixes. The upstream developers themselves deprecate the > >>use of the version 0.109.2, the one currently in Lenny. > > LC> 659 files changed, 134591 insertions(+), 119489 deletions(-) > > LC> Hmm, who is going to explain this in detail? > > LC> You seem to also forget about it being a library and changing shlibs > LC> means also work for reverse dependencies (either for ignoring this > LC> version in unstable or for using it when you would succeed in convincing > LC> us to include it in testing). > > The new version is 100% backward compatible, as a matter of fact there > were no changes in the lib's API or ABI, just a lot of fixes in the > code of the *jackd* server, which is built from the same sources.
Well, it's still way too much to review, so we would prefer a targeted fix to be uploaded to testing-proposed-updates. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org