> > At least I am sure that either I put my own code under the GPL, or, if > > I was lazy, I did not license it at all (which would make the model > > completely undistributable). (To simplify things, I hereby license all > > all the model code I authored under the GPLv2.) > > That might become a problem, xblast iteself is GPL (without version > meaning any version) if it's wanted to switch to GPLv3 (or even later) > if you say GPLv2 explict. See above, xblast ever was under GPL without > version restriction and you originally said yourself that it was put > under the GPL (no version restriction).
I meant GPL (unknown version), not GPL (no restriction). However, the GPL version will not be a blocker, once the rest is resolved. > > Some models which I recall others of us to have developed: > > felix > > wuschel > > wusel > > For these I do not know, under which licenses they are today. Hence I > > recommend a license audit for them. > > It would be helpful if you have some contact informations on who these > "others of us" might be so they can be queried, otherwise those will to > have get stripped, too. Here are some guesses on other authors, with two-sided error: Immanuel Halupczok Sebastian Holzmann Bernhard R. Link Konstantin Seiler Stefan Uhl If the sources are recovered, I assume them to contain better information. Best regards, Mark Weyer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
