On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:51:06AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:30:57PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote: > > [Thu, 14 Jul 2005] Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > BTW, i don't think it is a good idea to distribute boost binaries built > > > with a compiler that has never seen the boost regression test suite. > > I got uneasy as well but ooking on the boost webpage, there was no newer > > release yet. > here is a pointer to the 1.33.0 release status: > http://lists.boost.org/boost/2005/07/30375.php > > Sure. What do you think about running the testsuite on each build? > it is a good idea. > the test suite results are produced as html pages. most of the debian > users would not be interested in them. what about providing a separate > binary package i.e. libboost-regression? Ultimately, what would be most useful from a QA standpoint is a test suite that can output either a success or failure code during the package build, and information about which tests failed if any. I'm pretty sure that *no* users are interested in having the test suite results packaged. :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
