Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:02:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285475: fixed in asclock 2.0.12-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2004 14:21:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 13 06:21:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c203038.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.38]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cdr4X-0004S2-00; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 06:21:09 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Cdr8q-0005D1-Jl; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:25:36 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: asclock: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'date_xpm'
follows non-static declaration
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:25:36 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: asclock
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'asclock' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
In file included from asclock.c:7:
default_theme/date.xpm:2: error: static declaration of 'date_xpm' follows
non-static declaration
asclock.h:45: error: previous declaration of 'date_xpm' was here
In file included from asclock.c:8:
default_theme/weekday.xpm:2: error: static declaration of 'weekday_xpm' follows
non-static declaration
asclock.h:43: error: previous declaration of 'weekday_xpm' was here
asclock.c: In function 'main':
asclock.c:191: warning: implicit declaration of function 'mytime'
asclock.c:77: warning: unused variable 'hadArguments'
asclock.c:68: warning: unused variable 'themesdir'
asclock.c:67: warning: unused variable 'ret'
asclock.c: In function 'GetXPM':
asclock.c:279: warning: unused variable 'col'
asclock.c: In function 'InsertTime':
asclock.c:578: warning: unused variable 'thisdate'
asclock.c:578: warning: unused variable 'thisweekday'
asclock.c:578: warning: unused variable 'thismonth'
make[1]: *** [asclock.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/asclock-2.0.12'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
With the attached patch 'asclock' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/asclock-2.0.12/languages/english/month.xpm
./languages/english/month.xpm
--- ../tmp-orig/asclock-2.0.12/languages/english/month.xpm 1998-09-29
08:47:05.000000000 +0200
+++ ./languages/english/month.xpm 2004-12-13 15:19:16.948307952 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* XPM */
-static char *month_xpm[] = {
+char *month_xpm[] = {
/* width height num_colors chars_per_pixel */
" 22 72 4 1",
/* colors */
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/asclock-2.0.12/languages/english/weekday.xpm
./languages/english/weekday.xpm
--- ../tmp-orig/asclock-2.0.12/languages/english/weekday.xpm 1998-09-29
08:47:15.000000000 +0200
+++ ./languages/english/weekday.xpm 2004-12-13 15:19:23.491313264 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* XPM */
-static char *weekday_xpm[] = {
+char *weekday_xpm[] = {
/* width height num_colors chars_per_pixel */
" 20 42 4 1",
/* colors */
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/asclock-2.0.12/themes/classic/clock.xpm
./themes/classic/clock.xpm
--- ../tmp-orig/asclock-2.0.12/themes/classic/clock.xpm 1999-02-20
10:51:50.000000000 +0100
+++ ./themes/classic/clock.xpm 2004-12-13 15:18:58.291144272 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* XPM */
-static char * clock_xpm[] = {
+char * clock_xpm[] = {
"64 64 44 1",
" c #CF3CCF3CCF3C",
". c #30C230C230C2",
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/asclock-2.0.12/themes/classic/date.xpm
./themes/classic/date.xpm
--- ../tmp-orig/asclock-2.0.12/themes/classic/date.xpm 1999-03-26
17:54:54.000000000 +0100
+++ ./themes/classic/date.xpm 2004-12-13 15:19:31.325122344 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* XPM */
-static char *date_xpm[] = {
+char *date_xpm[] = {
/* width height num_colors chars_per_pixel */
" 90 13 4 1",
/* colors */
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 285475-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 00:10:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 16 17:10:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dtwjk-0004zq-00; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:10:28 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dtwc1-0002rB-00; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:02:29 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcelo E. Magallon)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#285475: fixed in asclock 2.0.12-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:02:29 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: asclock
Source-Version: 2.0.12-8
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
asclock, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
asclock-themes_2.0.12-8_all.deb
to pool/main/a/asclock/asclock-themes_2.0.12-8_all.deb
asclock_2.0.12-8.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/asclock/asclock_2.0.12-8.diff.gz
asclock_2.0.12-8.dsc
to pool/main/a/asclock/asclock_2.0.12-8.dsc
asclock_2.0.12-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/asclock/asclock_2.0.12-8_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated asclock package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:31:27 -0600
Source: asclock
Binary: asclock asclock-themes
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.0.12-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
asclock - A clock designed with the NeXTStep look
asclock-themes - Theme files for ASclock, a clock applet
Closes: 285475
Changes:
asclock (2.0.12-8) unstable; urgency=low
.
* themes/classic/*.xpm: remove static qualifier from data, makes gcc 4.0
happy (closes: bug#285475)
Files:
3662d0228c76097beba9ac60acfcc11a 904 x11 optional asclock_2.0.12-8.dsc
42c4ba0289d958ec7ccb4c5d03077f02 33110 x11 optional asclock_2.0.12-8.diff.gz
970ecacdce347facd6146090a711aa8b 106440 x11 optional
asclock-themes_2.0.12-8_all.deb
400874c1ed280fcf4623fc6551b8dc10 25744 x11 optional asclock_2.0.12-8_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJC2ZmVAAoJEHGYqCCEBNUA8xYH/1Etb0xSaqEX/IPIO3inxf9X
XDF+fZKU6z6y4rYBUrsk9LNsmCwzZv973B3kjsYSDKjVNxMoSUecg1JcxyAw1xCM
7iQH3tj/x1A9Hnt6vprqmgaphLgL5hlzfSRidjQXz4v4c803Uhqv4uciUtn/rb9l
GH07NZIJdjnI86QsC23DvaIND0UkMaaFc9EyjXsTgnXP0YtWiDsexijN+xy82Idk
Bnzxf7qHdJsDvliW6rBZIUOSQn+d80c3RaE0CDAh94uRUi1lBzZbmxk/KZbsXqu/
8C2BZQy0vIHMEfBrZV3TllaXtWyKjI7PegxapCNUsybSVK32imjFszRdYwyswY8=
=lDIA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
