Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:58:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318725: libpcre3-dev: Cannot be installed (wrong 
dependency)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 09:57:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 02:57:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1Du5ty-0007vK-00; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 02:57:38 -0700
Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de 
[130.75.25.242])
        by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
j6H9vWwE029555
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:57:32 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de 
[130.75.25.91])
        by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578751B604
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:57:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
        id 148CA1A6C7; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:57:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:57:27 +0200
From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libpcre3-dev: Cannot be installed (wrong dependency)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg
X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.2.2 
(mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41]); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:57:32 +0200 (MEST)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libpcre3-dev
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge

(This has been reproduced on an i386 sarge changeroot)
I wanted to rebuild arson which in turn need kdelibs4-dev which in
turn needs libpcre3-dev which cannot be installed:

remaxp:~# env LANG=C apt-get install libpcre3-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libpcre3-dev: Depends: libpcre3 (= 4.5-1.2) but 5.0-1 is to be installed
E: Broken packages

It would be great if you could fix the dependency and get an updated package
included in the next point release of sarge.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
-- 
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys.           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                       gpg signed mail preferred 
    64bit GNU powered                  http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
          Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 318725-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 10:59:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 03:59:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p4-7014.uk2net.com [213.232.95.15] (Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1Du6rr-0002u4-00; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 03:59:31 -0700
Received: from 83-216-128-59.ianbak749.adsl.metronet.co.uk ([83.216.128.59] 
helo=[192.168.1.100])
        by p4-7014.uk2net.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
        (Exim 4.52)
        id 1Du6qh-0008Qh-1U; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:59:30 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:58:18 +0100
From: Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED],  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.216.128.59
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#318725: libpcre3-dev: Cannot be installed (wrong dependency)
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on p4-7014.uk2net.com)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Helge Kreutzmann wrote:

>The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  libpcre3-dev: Depends: libpcre3 (= 4.5-1.2) but 5.0-1 is to be installed
>E: Broken packages
>  
>
It is built to depend on the same version as the library that's built at 
the same time. I therefore uploaded library and -dev packages of 4.5-1.2 
together, and of 5.0-1 together. If somehow 5.0 of the library had got 
into sarge but the same version of the -dev package hadn't, that would 
clearly be a bug, but not anything to do with me. However, this doesn't 
appear to be the case. As far as I can see sarge contains 4.5-1.2 of 
both, and unstable contains 5.0-1 of both. How you have ended up with 
5.0-1 of the library on your system I don't know.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to