Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> writes:
> Package: libidn11
> Version: 1.12-1
> Severity: serious
>
> ,----[ /usr/share/doc/libidn11/copyright ]
> | Files: doc/libidn.texi
> | Copyright: Copyright 2002-2009 Simon Josefsson.
> | License: GFDL-1.3+
> | This is the manual, licensed under GFDLv1.3+.
> |
> | Copyright @copyright{} 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009
> Simon Josefsson.
> |
> | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
> | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
> | any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
> | Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A
> | copy of the license is included in the section entitled ``GNU Free
> | Documentation License''.
> |
> | On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU Free Documentation
> | License Version 1.3 can be found in the file
> | `/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL-1.3'.
> `----
>
> Unfortunately it cannot be found there, so until base-files includes
> that file you have to full-quote the GFDL 1.3 in debian/copyright.
Oops! I blindly changed 1.3 to 1.2 without checking that the file was
there.
> I think it would be good to actually ship the GFDL 1.3 in base-files,
> since more packages are going to switch to it and it may still be a long
> road to GFDL 2.0. X-Debbugs-CC to the base-files maintainer for his
> opinion.
I think that would be good too. Several GNU projects have changed to
GFDL 1.3 recently. Do you think we should upload a new package with the
complete GFDLv1.3 license in copyright, or wait until the base-files
maintainers respond?
/Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
