Hi Kumar, Jim has a point with the compat, and the fact that power related topics are *very* sensible. so thanks for opening the door.
2009/3/19 Kumar Appaiah <a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in> > Dear Arnaud, > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:39:44PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > The best solution is to solve this upstream, by renaming one or the > other. > > In PowerMan, pm stands well for Power Man, and is the client tool. > > What is exactly pm in speech-tools? > > It is a non-sophisticated pitchmarking Perl script. Because the > pitchmark program does this anyway, I don't think there should be a > problem in renaming pm to something more sensible, though I can't > think of any such name. Do you have a suggestion? > since I don't use these, and have only a vague idea of the purpose, it's a bit hard. moreover knowing that there is already a pitchmark binary with a man placeholder too! a few possibilities: simple-pitchmark, perl-pitchmark cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/ Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
