On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:18:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Gerrit Pape:
> > The attack under discussion is a bruteforce attack.
> 
> No, it's not, it's about 100 times faster than brute force.

We're discussing the birthday attack.  A birthday attack is a special
type of brute force attack.
 http://www.google.com/search?q=%22birthday+attack%22+type+of+%22brute+force%22

My statement was in response to the suggested analogy to sniffing
telnet.

> > o Don't apply a patch against the djbdns binary package, but document the
> > fact more prominently.  In fact it's already documented for years by
> > upstream, and again detailled in his 'Februar 2009 comments'.
> 
> This is incorrect, the old version cannot be reasonably interpreted to
> mean that a resolver running dnscache can be poisoned within
> 20 minutes.

Since years the docs say
 'tens of millions of guesses are adequate with a colliding attack;'

With the 15000 packets/s assumption from Day you get to 22 minutes.  I'd
say it definitely can be 'reasonably interpreted' so.

> > o Apply a patch to dbndns, the Debian fork of djbdns, that limits
> > concurrent outgoing SOA queries to 20.  I'm of the opinion that this
> > makes the attack significantly harder.
> 
> No, it doesn't.  Any cache miss will do.  There is just a slight
> inefficiency when you have to switch names to get the next round of
> cache misses.

CVE-2008-4392 doesn't detail such an attack.  Can you point to more
details, a paper, or an implementation of this attack, that back up the
claim?  Specifically I doubt the 'slight inefficiency'.

> > AFAIK from private discussion, the Debian security team doesn't agree
> > with my assessment.  I don't know what their plans are for stable.
> 
> I still hope to get a better patch.

While we wait for who knows how long, I suggest we get the fix for
#518169 into stable; packages still are available through
 http://niequai.smarden.org/ruGho2e/

Regards, Gerrit.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to