severity 526546 important thanks
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:18:48AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > right, I missed that part. So this is indeed just important. > Thanks! > > I will followup with upstream regarding more architecture supports, but in > > the > > meantime what's the reason not to have this in testing, for archs in which > > it > > works? Can't we leave it "important" for now? > > Just following upstream isn't enough - upstreams' don't neccesarily care about > all the archs debian supports. For example the unshare syscall which is one > of the reason's that could cause the error message, is supported on arm. Yes, that's why I wrote followup, not follow, as in I will actively talk with upstream to make this happen :) Thanks, Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
