On Wednesday 22 July 2009, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 21.07.2009 07:23, Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> > Package: binutils
> > Version: 2.19.51.20090714-1
> >
> >> There were no error messages or anything from the kernel; just the
> >> spontaneous reboot or hang. No configuration kernel configuration
> >> changes either; the only difference in a working test case and a
> >> non-working test case was building with different versions of binutils.
> >>
> >> There's nothing special about the PC that had the problem booting the
> >> kernel. It's an old machine that has never had problems with Linux.
> >
> > I can confirm that. I had to downgrade binutils to build a working 2.6.30.2
> > (or 2.6.30.1).
> >
> > In LKML other people also tracked down non-booting 2.6.30.x to be caused 
by
> > the actual binutils package in sid.
> 
> I can't see this kind of report for current Fedora and Ubuntu, which are 
both 
> based to a subset of the hjl's binutils patches (the Debian package is pure 
> upstream without these patches applied). As a quick check, please could you 
> recheck with the package found here:
> 
>    http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/amd64/binutils/download
>    http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/i386/binutils/download
> 
> 

No difference: neither 2.6.30.2 nor 2.6.30.1 work.

Regards,
-- 
Wolfgang Walter
Studentenwerk München
Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to