Hi, yes, this might be better, but this is the work of the maintainer and not from a developer, which fix a bug, so that the package isn't longer in rc-state (i.e. so it build properly).
If José is sending a RFH or RFA, than I can provide a package with a newer upstream version. Regards, Lars Eric On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:33:24PM +0200, Johan Walles wrote: > Packaging 2.0.14 might be a better idea; it should build just fine as it is. > > Regards //Johan (upstream) > > 2009/7/29 Lars Eric Scheidler <a...@pool.math.tu-berlin.de>: > > Hi, > > here is a patch for bubblemon 2.0.9-1, so it build properly. If You aren't > > reacting, I'm making an NMU. > > > > Best regards, > > Lars Eric Scheidler > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
