Your message dated Sun, 9 Aug 2009 09:06:45 +0930
with message-id <20090808233645.ga1...@audi.shelbyville.oz>
and subject line Re: Bug#539687: Please restore .la at least temporarily
has caused the Debian Bug report #539687,
regarding libogg-dev: Removal of .la should have been coordinated with other
packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
539687: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539687
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libogg-dev
Version: 1.1.4~dfsg-1
Severity: important
Hello,
The removal of the libogg.la is problematic because at least libtheora-dev,
libshout3-dev, libflac-dev and libvorbis-dev distribute .la which depends on
libogg.la .
So packages using libtool to build and depending of one of these libs will fail
to build.
I'm not sure what's the correct way forward:
* Remove the .la from these packages
* rebuild them so that their .la don't reference libogg.la
* ...
Kind regards,
--
Xtophe
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libogg-dev depends on:
ii libogg0 1.1.4~dfsg-1 Ogg bitstream library
libogg-dev recommends no packages.
libogg-dev suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Steve,
Sorry for not handling this more elegantly, but it should be trivial to
fix without flipping about halfway through now. Please bring any packages
you are aware of that are still affected by this to the attention of the
release team and request binNMUs of them. Some of them are being adopted
by other people and should be fixed when those uploads are done, and a
good number of them have already been binNMUed. I'm not aware of the
libsndfile package already being scheduled for that, but that should still
be quicker for you than me churning another modified package though. The
other packages don't need to be modified immediately, they just need to be
rebuilt against current libogg to drop their dependency on its .la
Ron
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 03:59:57PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Package: libogg-dev
> Version: 1.1.4~dfsg-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> The removal leaves me unable to build one of my packages (simage) that
> build-depends on libsndfile1-dev, among others.
>
> Please consider restoring the .la file until dependent packages have
> dropped it.
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
>
> Versions of packages libogg-dev depends on:
> ii libogg0 1.1.4~dfsg-1 Ogg bitstream library
>
> libogg-dev recommends no packages.
>
> libogg-dev suggests no packages.
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
--- End Message ---
