forcemerge 483971 557359 thanks Am Samstag, den 21.11.2009, 20:53 +0100 schrieb Guido Günther: > Hi Felix, > Thanks for the quick response. > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 07:04:42PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > Looks like you forgot about 483971 and 442382. > > and maybe even others. Haven't looked this multipath issue now all > up. > > But i remembered it was you who has interest in multipath support > inside > > debian-installer and so grub2 too. > Nope, I didn't. This one is different as it breaks upgrades from > existing and supported installations.
It is not different. The older ones were reassigned to grub-common and you filed this against grub-common (actually even grub-probe). If it's more important then wishlist then the severity of that bug needs to be changed and not a new one filed which exactly says the same: to implement multipath support inside grub-probe. > > I'm a bit unsure if I should just merge this with 483971 or reassign > at > > GRUB Legacy, where the dummy grub package still is, and add a > debconf > > note that gets shown when multipath is detected and tells people to > keep > > Legacy for now. > That would at least be a workaround. > > > But it still looks like that you're the only one for whom multipath > is > > important. (Well and Frans who considers this as a blocker, but it > > didn't block the switch to grub2 as default for d-i alpha1) > Don't think so. Multipath is run in "enterprise" environments where > people are much more conservative regarding upgrades. I'm starting to > get reports from etch->lenny upgrades so don't expect many others to > notice within the next year. > Cheers, > -- Guido Seems like I have to take it literarily that you get the reports. The debian-testing mailing list were all upgrade-reports end doestn't say anything about multipath back to 2008/12. -- Felix Zielcke Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org