Hi Jonathan,

as you can read in the attached mail, overkill is shortly before removal
from Debian. In September, you showed some interest in overkill, and I
suggested that you take over maintenance.[1] Do you still want to do
this, or should we rather remove overkill from Debian?

Greetings,
Joachim

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548563

Am Sonntag, den 29.11.2009, 18:25 +0000 schrieb Simon McVittie:
> Package: overkill
> Version: 0.16-14
> Severity: serious
> Justification: RC security bug, unmaintained upstream, low popcon (20 votes)
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: proposed-removal
> 
> overkill seems like a possible candidate for removal from Debian:
> 
> * security-buggy (#549310, overflows a heap-allocated buffer when constructing
>   outgoing network packets)
> * coding style suggests that many more overflow vulnerabilities are likely
> * declining popcon with only 20 votes
> * no upstream release since 2001 despite security vulnerabilities
> 
> If you want to keep this package around in Debian, please just close this bug,
> and do an upload to fix the issues in it. In this package's case, I think this
> is likely to require becoming the (de facto) upstream maintainer.
> 
> If you don't think it's worth keeping, please send the following commands
> to cont...@bugs.debian.org, replacing nnnnnn with this bug's number:
> 
> severity nnnnnn normal
> reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org
> retitle nnnnnn RM: <packagename> -- RoM; <reasons>
> thanks 
> 
> For more information, see
> http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt
> 
> Regards,
>     smcv
>     at the Cambridge BSP


-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply via email to