Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:29:12 +0200 (METDST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322706: /usr/bin/ghemical: Missing dependency on lapack3 and refblas3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 10:40:26 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 03:40:26 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kalium.kiku.dk [130.225.100.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3Wxe-0005Nr-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:40:26 -0700 Received: from positron.kiku.dk ([130.225.100.61]) by kalium.kiku.dk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1E3WxU-0005Ep-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:40:16 +0200 Received: from moffe by positron.kiku.dk with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E3WxT-00041g-Mq; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:40:15 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: /usr/bin/ghemical: Missing dependency on lapack3 and refblas3 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:40:14 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ghemical Version: 1.51-1 Severity: grave File: /usr/bin/ghemical Justification: renders package unusable Ghemical is missing dependency on lapack3 and refblas3: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ldd /usr/bin/ghemical [...] liblapack.so.3 => not found libblas.so.3 => not found [...] "apt-get install lapack3 refblas3" installs the missing packages after which ghemical works fine. Regards /Rasmus -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3 Locale: LANG=da_DK.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to da_DK.ISO8859-1) Versions of packages ghemical depends on: ii atlas3-base [liblapack.so 3.6.0-19 Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra ii freeglut3 2.2.0-8.1 OpenGL Utility Toolkit ii gdk-imlib1 1.9.14-16.2 imaging library for use with gtk ( ii gtkglarea5 1.2.3-2 Gimp Toolkit OpenGL area widget sh ii libart2 1.4.2-20 The GNOME canvas widget - runtime ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libc6 2.3.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb3 3.2.9-22 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libesd0 0.2.36-1 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libg2c0 1:3.4.4-5 Runtime library for GNU Fortran 77 ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-4 GCC support library ii libghemical0 1.90-1 Molecular Modelling Library ii libglade-gnome0 1:0.17-3 Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglade0 1:0.17-3 Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-10 The GLib library of C routines ii libglu1-xorg [libglu1] 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Mesa OpenGL utility library [X.Org ii libgnome32 1.4.2-20 The GNOME libraries ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-20 The GNOME libraries (Support libra ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-20 The GNOME libraries (User Interfac ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libopenbabel0c2 1.100.2-3 Convert and manipulate chemical da ii libsc6c2 2.2.3-2 The Scientific Computing Toolkit ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++6 4.0.1-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Input extension li ii libxml1 1:1.8.17-10 GNOME XML library ii mpqc 2.2.3-2 The Massively Parallel Quantum Che ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Mesa 3D graphics library [X.Org] ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-3 compression library - runtime ghemical recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 322706-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Aug 2005 09:29:18 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 13 02:29:18 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from neutrino.kiku.dk [130.225.100.50] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3sKL-0003Ab-00; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 02:29:17 -0700 Received: from neutrino.kiku.dk ([130.225.100.50]) by neutrino.kiku.dk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1E3sKG-00070B-00; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:29:12 +0200 Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:29:12 +0200 (METDST) From: Rasmus B Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#322706: /usr/bin/ghemical: Missing dependency on lapack3 and refblas3 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Michael Banck wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Rasmus B=F8g Hansen wrote: > > Ghemical is missing dependency on lapack3 and refblas3: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ldd /usr/bin/ghemical > > [...] > > liblapack.so.3 =3D> not found > > libblas.so.3 =3D> not found > > [...] > > > > "apt-get install lapack3 refblas3" installs the missing packages after > > which ghemical works fine. > > Hmm, ghemical here has the following Depends: > > nighthawk~/build$ dpkg -I ghemical_1.51-1_i386.deb |grep Depends > Depends: atlas3-base | lapack3 | liblapack.so.3, atlas3-base | refblas3 > =09| libblas.so.3 > > Did you have atlas3-base installed? Perhaps you need to add > /usr/lib/atlas/ to /etc/ld.so.conf, I am not uptodate with that atlas > stuff, maybe there is some documentation in /usr/share/doc/atlas3-base > about this. If this is the case, could you please test this by removing > lapack3 and refblas3 again and proceed as indicated by the atlas > packages? Apparently the problem was the missing line in /etc/ld.so.conf; perhaps from an old installation of atlas. Anyway, now I can't reproduce it on neither the formerly problematic machine, nor on another sid machine which never had ghemical installed. On the first machine I purged atlas and reinstalled ghemical; no problems at all... atlas3-base is pulled in as by dependencies and the correct line is added to ld.so.conf. I close the bug as it seems to be unreproducible now. Regards /Rasmus --=20 Rasmus B=F8g Hansen | Department of Chemistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] | University of Copenhagen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]