Hi Dne Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:53:54 +0000 Robert Lemmen <rober...@semistable.com> napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:23:08AM +0100, Michal ??iha?? wrote: > > I know there have not been any changes to the secure-delete package for > > some time, but I hope you're still interested in it. Program smem is > > part of it and now it is also name of another package and binary which > > I did upload. I contacted smem upstream, but they think that renaming > > smem from secure-delete is a better option (low user base, smem is > > still considered beta for ages). What is your opinion about this? > > fully agree, smem is not really of much use (compared to srm), i'll > rename it and upload a new version the next days Thanks a lot! Reassigning related bug to secure-delete. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature