Daniel Burrows <dburr...@debian.org> (18/01/2010): > It looks like the build succeeded on all the release > architectures, so I think I might downgrade this so that aptitude > can get into testing. (the version currently there is ancient and I > don't really want it to be held up even further by problems on one > of the experimental archs now that it seems to work everywhere else)
No, it didn't. kfreebsd-* are release architectures… > > (The waitpid() issue still has to be investigated. But I see it > > also happens on other architectures, like amd64.) > > The waitpid() thing turned out to be mostly spurious; I've fixed > it in head. I can't see how it would have caused a double-free, > though. I didn't say it would have, my point was just about making sure it wasn't unnoticed. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
