On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:26:46PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 05-Aug-17 17:00, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > For those following, the problem is that people are building 64-bit > > libraries on a 32-bit platform (or the other way around) as part of the > > package build. dpkg-shlibdeps uses plain old "ldd" to find out the > > dependencies of a binary or shared library, but the ldd on the system > > won't be able to identify the impostor libraries.
> > This'll fail with: > > dpkg_shlibdeps -p lib64z1 -lbuild-tree/zlib-1.2.3 > > /usr/bin/ldd: line 161: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2: cannot execute > > binary file > > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on > > `debian/lib64z1/usr/lib64/libz.so.1.2.3' gave error exit status 1 > > dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 256 > > In this example, the 32-bit i386 ldd on my system can't read the amd64 > > binaries that have been generated. > Please 'apt-get install amd64-libs' and try this again. 'ldd' should > work then. > The current 'ldd' already supports biarch. > However, to work for 64-bit binaries, 'ldd' needs the 64-bit linker > '/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2'. This linker is currently in 'amd64-libs' > (this may change to 'libc6-amd64' later). > This means that the problem can be solved by always installing > 'amd64-libs' (or 'libc6-amd64') before dpkg-shlibdeps is used for > a 64-bit binary. No, that doesn't solve the problem. How are you supposed to invoke a 64-bit linker for a bi-arch build being done on a 32-bit buildd? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
