Hi there, On Thursday 29 October 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > You may use mkfifo instead of mknod, since there is no policy > prohibition on mkfifo (and it can't be used to make special > files). Perhaps we can add a footnote to policy mentioning mkfifo where > the mknod prohibition is written?
what about the suggested change? Is anything blocking this fix? :) Thanks and with kind regards, Jan. -- Never write mail to <w...@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned! -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
