On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 20:30:38 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > If it is possible, when you are dooing the next run of the archive > > rebuild, could you sent this to the bugreport? > Hi, > here is the log (two build attempts, both failed).
Thanks alot! And now for the interesting aspect: > t/getrusage.t ..... > 1..2 > # getrusage > # ru = 1.356084 0.008 0 0 0 0 1001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 > # times > # tsu = 1.35, tss = 0 > # sleep(6) > # real = 9 > # ruu = 1.356084, tsu = 1.35 > # rus = 0.008, tss = 0 > # ruc = 1.364084, tsc = 1.35 > # real = 9 > # far: a = 1.356084, b = 1.35, r = 0.2 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0.00450666666666666 > # far: a = 0.008, b = 0, r = 0.4 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = - > ok 1 > # @ru = (2.708169 0.008 0 0 0 0 1056 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 152) > # far: a = 2.708169, b = 2.708169, r = 0.2 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0 > # far: a = 0.008, b = 0.008, r = 0.4 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0 > ok 2 > ok > t/times.t ......... > 1..2 > # CORE::times() = 2.69 0.01 0 0 > # times = 2.692168 0.016001 0 0 > # BSD::Resource::times() = 2.692168 0.016001 0 0 > # far: a = 2.692168, b = 2.69, r = 0.1 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0.000805947955390351 > # far: a = 0.016001, b = 0.01, r = 0.5 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0.6001 > not ok 1 > # far: a = 2.692168, b = 2.692168, r = 0.1 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0 > # far: a = 0.016001, b = 0.016001, r = 0.1 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0 > # far: a = 0, b = 0, r = 0.1 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = - > # far: a = 0, b = 0, r = 0.1 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = - > ok 2 > Failed 1/2 subtests > > Test Summary Report > ------------------- > t/times.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 1 > Files=8, Tests=41, 20 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.00 sys + 5.54 cusr 0.06 > csys = 5.64 CPU) > Result: FAIL > t/getrusage.t ..... > 1..2 > # getrusage > # ru = 3.336208 0.024001 0 0 0 0 1002 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 58 > # times > # tsu = 3.33, tss = 0.02 > # sleep(6) > # real = 9 > # ruu = 3.336208, tsu = 3.33 > # rus = 0.024001, tss = 0.02 > # ruc = 3.360209, tsc = 3.35 > # real = 9 > # far: a = 3.336208, b = 3.33, r = 0.2 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0.00186426426426434 > # far: a = 0.024001, b = 0.02, r = 0.4 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0.20005 > ok 1 > # @ru = (6.008375 0.028001 0 0 0 0 1057 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 99) > # far: a = 6.008375, b = 6.008375, r = 0.2 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0 > # far: a = 0.028001, b = 0.028001, r = 0.4 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0 > ok 2 > ok > t/times.t ......... > 1..2 > # CORE::times() = 5.34 0.01 0 0 > # times = 5.344334 0.016001 0 0 > # BSD::Resource::times() = 5.344334 0.016001 0 0 > # far: a = 5.344334, b = 5.34, r = 0.1 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0.000811610486891379 > # far: a = 0.016001, b = 0.01, r = 0.5 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0.6001 > not ok 1 > # far: a = 5.344334, b = 5.344334, r = 0.1 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0 > # far: a = 0.016001, b = 0.016001, r = 0.1 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = 0 > # far: a = 0, b = 0, r = 0.1 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = - > # far: a = 0, b = 0, r = 0.1 > # far: abs(a/b-1) = - > ok 2 > Failed 1/2 subtests > > Test Summary Report > ------------------- > t/times.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 1 > Files=8, Tests=41, 19 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.02 sys + 11.50 cusr 0.07 > csys = 11.62 CPU) > Result: FAIL So this time t/getrusage.t passes twice, but now t/times.t fails twice. *sigh* I'm thinking more and more that these tests are broken by design, and I'm inclined to skip them. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x00F3CFE4, 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Bob Dylan: Visions of Johanna
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
