tag 566902 patch thanks A Mennucc <[email protected]> (25/01/2010): > (just for the record , according to > http://release.debian.org/squeeze/arch_qualify.html kfreebsd-* may > be part of the next release, but is at risk, while hurd is not even > considered. So much for "several release archs".)
Yes, 2 is plural.
>> I /think/ the 002_ia64_libc.patch patch is a bit braindead. It doesn't
>> even do the job given there are more than just libc6 and libc6.1. As of
>> this writing, we have:
>> libc6
>> libc6.1 on alpha & ia64
>> libc0.3 on hurd-i386
>> libc0.1 on kfreebsd-*.
>> Please unfuck this.
>
> Feel free to send a better patch anytime.
What about those two lines?
>>> import ctypes.util
>>> ctypes.util.find_library('c')
'libc.so.0.1'
And since support for python 2.4 is going away, I guess we don't care
about introducing a dependency on 2.5 (ctypes is said to be new in
this version). Another way, if you don't like ctypes, might be to just
look for something matching the '/lib/libc.so*' pattern. Not so clean
but your call.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
