On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > clone 569241 -1 > reassign -1 569241 libdirectfb-dev > retitle -1 libdirectfb-dev: please depend on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev > block 569241 by -1 > thanks > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:13:14AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Package: libsdl-image1.2-dev > > Version: 1.2.10-1 > > Severity: serious > > > > Hello Debian SDL packages maintainers, > > > > There is a new version of libjpeg (libjpeg8) that replace libjpeg62. > > libjpeg62-dev is only kept for LSB compatibility and should not be > > used for building packages. > > > > libsdl-image1.2-dev depends on libjpeg62-dev. Please change it to depends on > > libjpeg-dev instead. Please also change the Build-Dependency to be on > > libjpeg-dev and not libjpeg62-dev. > > > > This dependency on libjpeg62-dev prevent packages Build-Depending on both > > libsdl-image1.2-dev and libjpeg-dev to install their dependencies, due to > > the > > conflict between libjpeg62-dev and libjpeg-dev. > > > > Fixed in the SVN, but the package is not buildable, due to > libdirectfb-dev depending on libjpeg62-dev.
Hello Aurélien, sorry for the trouble. Please note that I have already reported a bug against libdirectfb-dev. Cheers, Bill. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
