Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:15:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324445: Lingering Priority: important libopencdk4 package
on AMD64 breaks installation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2005 05:20:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 21 22:20:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (arapahoe.cs.ecu.edu) [150.216.150.55]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E74jA-0002AF-00; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:20:08 -0700
Received: from atlantic.cs.ecu.edu (atlantic.cs.ecu.edu [150.216.150.163])
by arapahoe.cs.ecu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1ABFD3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:19:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from atlantic.cs.ecu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atlantic.cs.ecu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j7M5JG49024227
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:19:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by atlantic.cs.ecu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) id j7M5JGeQ024226
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:19:16 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:19:16 -0400
From: Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Lingering Priority: important libopencdk4 package on AMD64 breaks
installation
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libopencdk4
Version: 1:0.4.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: Breaks installation
When I was trying to install SID with a recent installer nightly (which
I assume doesn't diminish the relevance of this particular report),
the installation would fail on account of this package. Because
the priority of the package is 'important', the installer tries
to install it automatically, but it depends on libgcrypt1, which is not
in unstable (or testing or stable).
I notice that packages.debian.org lists libopencdk4 as being
available only for amd64, and as this package is quite old,
I figure that it should simply be dropped.
In trying to find reports of this problem, I found bug 272586,
which was supposed to have been fixed by changing the priority
of this package, amongst others.
Much love,
--
Miciah Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> / <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324445-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2005 06:15:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 21 23:15:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-038.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (quetzlcoatl.dodds.net)
[66.93.39.38]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E75ad-0004OI-00; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:15:23 -0700
Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C54033AE0; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:15:22 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#324445: Lingering Priority: important libopencdk4 package on
AMD64 breaks installation
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:19:16AM -0400, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wro=
te:
> Package: libopencdk4
> Version: 1:0.4.2-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: Breaks installation
> When I was trying to install SID with a recent installer nightly (which
> I assume doesn't diminish the relevance of this particular report),
> the installation would fail on account of this package. Because
> the priority of the package is 'important', the installer tries
> to install it automatically, but it depends on libgcrypt1, which is not
> in unstable (or testing or stable).
> I notice that packages.debian.org lists libopencdk4 as being
> available only for amd64, and as this package is quite old,
> I figure that it should simply be dropped.
It has been dropped, from the Debian archive; the fact that it is still
present in the Debian-AMD64 archive is not anything that the maintainer
of libopencdk4 can fix. You'll need to contact the admins for
Debian-AMD64 to get this taken care of, I think.
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDCW16KN6ufymYLloRAshKAJ43f0W/CXIhU3Yg2cXA5k66XO8KWgCcDl7H
NJcV+xerTz2zHcmPG3+2O44=
=ozY0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
