Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:17:49 +0000
with message-id <e1npqhr-00043a...@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#548965: fixed in levee 3.5a-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #548965,
regarding levee: [PATCH] fails to build with gcc-4.4/newer eglibc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
548965: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548965
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: levee
Version: 3.5a-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hi,

thanks for maintaining levee.

During Ubuntu's rebuild test, levee failed to build with gcc-4.4/newer eglibc
[1]. The reason is that the new eglibc nowadays defines getline.

Attached is a patch that renames the getline definition to getline_levee.

Cheers,
    Stefan.

[1]:
<http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31818191/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-amd64.levee_3.5a-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz>
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers karmic-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'karmic-updates'), (500, 'karmic-security'), (500, 'karmic')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-10-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- levee-3.5a.orig/editcor.c
+++ levee-3.5a/editcor.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
     
     clrprompt();
     printch('!');
-    if ( !getline(instring) )
+    if ( !getline_levee(instring) )
 	return FALSE;
 
     if ( (tf = mkstemp(scratch)) < 0 ) {
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- levee-3.5a.orig/extern.h
+++ levee-3.5a/extern.h
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
 extern char PROC line(), peekc(), readchar();
 extern char PROC *findparse(),*makepat();
 
-extern bool PROC getline();
+extern bool PROC getline_levee();
 extern bool PROC putfile();
 extern bool PROC doyank(), deletion(), putback();
 extern bool PROC pushb(),pushi(),pushmem(),uputcmd(), delete_to_undo();
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- levee-3.5a.orig/main.c
+++ levee-3.5a/main.c
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
     mode=emode;
     do {
 	prompt(FALSE,":");
-	if (getline(instring))
+	if (getline_levee(instring))
 	    exec(instring, &mode, &noquit);
 	indirect = FALSE;
 	if (mode == E_VISUAL && zotscreen && noquit) {	/*ask for more*/
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- levee-3.5a.orig/misc.c
+++ levee-3.5a/misc.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 #include "extern.h"
 
 bool PROC
-getline(str)
+getline_levee(str)
 char *str;
 {
     int len;
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- levee-3.5a.orig/move.c
+++ levee-3.5a/move.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
 	clrprompt();
 	if (cmd == PATT_FWD || cmd == PATT_BACK) {
 	    printch(tsearch = instring[0] = chars[cmd-PATT_FWD]);
-	    if (!getline(&instring[1]))
+	    if (!getline_levee(&instring[1]))
 		return ESCAPED;	/* needs to skip later tests */
 	}
 	else {
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- levee-3.5a.orig/proto.h
+++ levee-3.5a/proto.h
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
 int  PROC gcount(void);
 int  PROC getKey(void);
 int  PROC getcontext(char  c,int  begline);
-int  PROC getline(char  *str);
+int  PROC getline_levee(char  *str);
 int  PROC initialize(int  count,char  * *args);
 int  PROC inputf(char  *fname,int  newbuf);
 int  PROC insert_to_undo(struct  undostack *u,int  start,int  size);

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: levee
Source-Version: 3.5a-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
levee, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

levee_3.5a-1.1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/l/levee/levee_3.5a-1.1.debian.tar.gz
levee_3.5a-1.1.dsc
  to main/l/levee/levee_3.5a-1.1.dsc
levee_3.5a-1.1_i386.deb
  to main/l/levee/levee_3.5a-1.1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 548...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jari Aalto <jari.aa...@cante.net> (supplier of updated levee package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:48:08 +0200
Source: levee
Binary: levee
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.5a-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <f...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Jari Aalto <jari.aa...@cante.net>
Description: 
 levee      - very small vi clone
Closes: 548965
Changes: 
 levee (3.5a-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [Jari Aalto]
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Move to packaging format "3.0 (quilt)" due to patch.
   * debian/patches
     - (Number 10): Add patch to fix Gcc 4.4 error: conflicting types
       for getline (RC bug FTBFS serious; Closes: #548965).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 fbdf153c5858022863a469ae40ccd6686a6362e9 1207 levee_3.5a-1.1.dsc
 732495096f9c8f6befe1a75b647818639e37da88 6672 levee_3.5a-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 c819cef40fad1d30f2c042cd2f30e68ea23995dd 38422 levee_3.5a-1.1_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 060f67f058e8bc45fd66264f051b8424f9e4911f89ec969a75be80afaaba7ed7 1207 
levee_3.5a-1.1.dsc
 0b0f8abf38a2932bf2e1f656d927e3154fbd83b4588a6e6a29c463169cfd61cf 6672 
levee_3.5a-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 4bce04f69ae861c750c7db8965ce34bc057f51bc8fa72f2994d2e6be8e46bc70 38422 
levee_3.5a-1.1_i386.deb
Files: 
 da7d909d696b133f30dfe709af418cc0 1207 editors optional levee_3.5a-1.1.dsc
 1c3e35968c866a0c3851d7caeb0d64fe 6672 editors optional 
levee_3.5a-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 623f81ca1b6b972aca087c12a4a1d5f6 38422 editors optional levee_3.5a-1.1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuPPhEACgkQpdwBkPlyvgOcFQCZAexvm0gKdLQ3hF1vy1YOIqai
R8oAnjpG7FrADU/UeCULUfxC3VMaTlxW
=XuHg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to