On Fri, 14 May 2010 16:48:48 +0200, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote:
> Conflicts are not meant for this.  Debian policy says no two programs
> with the same filename and different functionality are allowed, and the
> only possible resolutions are to rename one or both of the programs.

Wow.  I don't recall policy section 10.1 at all, and I'm not at all sure
that I think this makes the world a better place.  But, you are correct
in your assertion that policy demands this class of conflict be resolved.

Johnathan, was there negativity to the change or just a lack of concern
about the issue because we though Conflicts would take care of it?
Seems to me that making the change is the right solution.

Of course, we need to figure out why I'm still getting two failures in the
test suite building against current Debian unstable pasted below before
I will be able to upload a new version regardless of what we decide on
this issue.  Any thoughts?

Bdale


1) test: qa_gr_fir_fff::t2 (F) line: 190 qa_gr_fir_fff.cc
double equality assertion failed
- Expected: -322997024
- Actual  : nan
- Delta   : 2906973.216


2) test: qa_gri_mmse_fir_interpolator::t1 (F) line: 57 qa_gri_mmse_fir_interpola
tor.cc
double equality assertion failed
- Expected: 0.192101076245308
- Actual  : nan
- Delta   : 0.004

Attachment: pgpn1RhO0zyIl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to