Funny, the two Adams confused me for a moment... On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 06:24 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > Adam > > > thanks for the report > > > life and slepc have ben broken by petsc 3.1 upload and the fact that > petsc 3.1 does not ship > /usr/lib/petsc/conf/base > > Adam, > could you please ship this file with a new petsc upload so that I fix life > and slepc ?
I just added a symlink to 3.1.dfsg-3 which should work. You'll need to Build-Depend on libpetsc3.1-dev (>= 3.1.dfsg-3) to ensure that it gets the version with this symlink. > Also the single lib build of petsc, though useful, also broke the life. I'm not sure what you mean by this, single lib? > An email to the package depending > on petsc would have warn me of the possible breakage. Good point. Is there a place to find a list of all of the reverse-depends easily? I don't see anything on the PTS. -Adam > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Adam D. Barratt > <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > Package: life > Version: 0.9.23-2 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > life build-depends on libpetsc3.0.0-dev, which has been > replaced by > libpetsc3.1-dev; the package is therefore unbuildable in > unstable. > > Regards, > > Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part