On Thursday 27 May 2010 03:08:58 Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Raphael Geissert (geiss...@debian.org) [100527 06:47]:
> > Those bugs are policy violations and make those packages FTBFS when using
> > dash from testing or experimental, or posh.
> > 
> > Tag them squeeze-ignore if you want, but their severity is 'serious.'
> 
> That's not your call to make.
> 
> The release team decided that these bugs are not release critical.

Hence my suggestion to mark them squeeze-ignore. 

They might not be release critical but their severity, in terms of the BTS, 
_is_ serious. Do we agree on that?

I find it perfectly reasonable for the RT to say they are not critical for the 
release.

> We intend to change that decision if only an acceptable number of such
> bugs is left.

I'm going to try to find time to work on those bugs so that LINENO can be 
reintroduced for squeeze.

> If you disagree, you can try to either convince us, or call the tech
> ctte.

Please, I think we can discuss and clarify our opinions without getting the 
tech ctte involved. It would be a waste of time for every party, and there's 
simply no need.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to