On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Hi Iustin, > > On 07/10/2010 08:39 PM, Iustin Pop wrote: > > I was planning to revert the move of the openjdk-6 from b-d-i to b-d, as > > an alternative to depend on default-jdk. The move was done simply to > > have 'jar' available during the build time for a few optional unittests > > which need it. > > I think that reverting that change is an abuse of b-d-i, it isn't > supposed to be an "optional build-depend" list.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. The jdk is *not* used during the binary build, except for unittests (if present). The jdk *is* used during the indep build, for the java part. What do you see here as an abuse? iustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
