On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 17:29 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:20:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > we may end up with a choice of temporarily breaking gnash in > > > testing or removing it if icu is otherwise ready to go and gnash isn't, > > > or at least isn't on all architectures. > > ...so we're back at needing a new upload, breaking gnash in testing or > > removing it. > > If it helps I can upload the package I built last week, with the > debdiff I sent to #587967. > > (If you'd like me to do this please also tell me where I should > upload to, i.e. DELAYED or not, which DELAYED queue, ...)
I'm slightly torn, to be honest. Uploading your new package would at least allow us to have a package in squeeze that's buildable. On the other hand, #575089 and the lack of activity on the potentially related upstream bug do make me wonder whether we should be releasing with gnash anyway :-/ Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
