Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2010 23:42:07 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package osgal has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #569442,
regarding osgal: FTBFS: chmod: cannot access 
`/build/user-osgal_0.6.1-2-amd64-XlHgbs/osgal-0.6.1/./configure': No such file 
or directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
569442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569442
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: osgal
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100211 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory 
> `/build/user-osgal_0.6.1-2-amd64-XlHgbs/osgal-0.6.1'
> make[1]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/user-osgal_0.6.1-2-amd64-XlHgbs/osgal-0.6.1'
> rm -f debian/stamp-makefile-build
> rm -rf debian/stamp-autotools-configure
> for i in ./config/config.guess ./config/config.sub  ; do \
>               if test -e $i.cdbs-orig ; then \
>                       mv $i.cdbs-orig $i ; \
>               fi ; \
>       done
> dh_clean 
> dh_clean: Compatibility levels before 5 are deprecated.
> rm -f debian/stamp-autotools-files
> rm -fr html
> rm -f configure
>  dpkg-source -b osgal-0.6.1
> dpkg-source: info: using source format `1.0'
> dpkg-source: info: building osgal using existing osgal_0.6.1.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: info: building osgal in osgal_0.6.1-2.diff.gz
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file configure
> dpkg-source: info: building osgal in osgal_0.6.1-2.dsc
>  debian/rules build
> test -x debian/rules
> mkdir -p "."
> if test -e /usr/share/misc/config.guess ; then \
>               for i in ./config/config.guess ; do \
>                       if ! test -e $i.cdbs-orig ; then \
>                               mv $i $i.cdbs-orig ; \
>                               cp --remove-destination 
> /usr/share/misc/config.guess $i ; \
>                       fi ; \
>               done ; \
>       fi
> if test -e /usr/share/misc/config.sub ; then \
>               for i in ./config/config.sub ; do \
>                       if ! test -e $i.cdbs-orig ; then \
>                               mv $i $i.cdbs-orig ; \
>                               cp --remove-destination 
> /usr/share/misc/config.sub $i ; \
>                       fi ; \
>               done ; \
>       fi
> touch debian/stamp-autotools-files
> chmod a+x /build/user-osgal_0.6.1-2-amd64-XlHgbs/osgal-0.6.1/./configure
> chmod: cannot access 
> `/build/user-osgal_0.6.1-2-amd64-XlHgbs/osgal-0.6.1/./configure': No such 
> file or directory
> make: *** [debian/stamp-autotools-configure] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/02/11/osgal_0.6.1-2_lsid64.buildlog

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [email protected]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [email protected]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.1-2+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/569442 in Debian BTS
against the package osgal. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/596998. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to