severity 601685 important On 29/10/10 06:17, tony mancill wrote: > I've applied the patch and committed the update to the packaging repo.
cool, thanks :) > I'm not sure I agree with the severity - the current package isn't completely > unusable, is it? (Your bug report says "mostly useless.") Would severity > important be more appropriate? oh, I picked that based on the fact that only 1/5 of the options are supported. after playing around with the package, i've found that this issue currently only affects js on java 5, so I guess "important" is better. (the other three libs are not supported by debian anyway, and js/bsf is included with java 6.) X -- GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org