Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:20:36 -0300
with message-id <aanlktimzf0p5-3rg1qnrjtevgospooqt5bg6lxi=a...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#602453: pd-pmpd: FTBFS - unoconv needs writable $HOME
has caused the Debian Bug report #602453,
regarding pd-pmpd: FTBFS - unoconv needs writable $HOME
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
602453: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602453
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pd-pmpd
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
pd-pmpd fires up unoconv to convert its manual from Star Office's
native format to PDF, but unoconv evidently needs a writable $HOME for
whatever reason:
| unoconv -f pdf
/build/buildd-pd-pmpd_0.9-1-i386-D5fhxp/pd-pmpd-0.9/manual/pmpd.sxw
| stat: cannot read file system information for `/home/buildd': No such file or
directory
| [Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument (elements.cxx).
| javaldx failed!
| Error: Unable to connect or start own listener. Aborting.
| make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_build] Error 251
To address this, you could either create and use a temporary $HOME or
split the docs and examples out into architecture-independent packages
(or perhaps a single such).
Could you please do so?
Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9-2
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 21:09, Aaron M. Ucko <u...@debian.org> wrote:
> Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> writes:
>
>> The pdf comes with upstream tarball, we were just regenerating it out
>> of principle. I think we can just install the upstream provided one.
>
> That's fair; under the circumstances, I won't object to that approach
> either, even if it isn't quite as pure. The important facts are that
> you have the source and can produce an equivalent PDF document with free
> tools.
Fixed in the last upload, forgot to close on the changelog.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--- End Message ---
