Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:49:42 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#327459: rekall build failure has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2005 09:40:04 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 02:40:04 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.74] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EE1q8-0005lL-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 02:40:04 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id EB35C3815D; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:40:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DADF3805D; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:40:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id A163726136; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:40:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:40:01 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: happy: FTBFS: configure: cannot find DocBook XSL stylesheets Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: happy Version: 1.15-1.1 Severity: serious Hi, It seems that happy is failing to build on a few arches. During configure I see: checking for DocBook XSL stylesheet directory... no configure: WARNING: cannot find DocBook XSL stylesheets, you will not be able to build the documentation While on others I see: checking for DocBook XSL stylesheet directory... /usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh The first then fail to build because they try to use /html/chunk.xsl instead of /usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh/html/chunk.xsl All the buildd logs show that they're using docbook-xsl_1.68.1-0.1_all.deb so I have no idea what is going on. Kurt --------------------------------------- Received: (at 327459-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 05:50:24 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 22:50:24 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from aputeaux-153-1-59-39.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr (namakemono.glandium.org) [82.124.13.39] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEhCy-000815-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:50:24 -0700 Received: from mh by namakemono.glandium.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEhCI-0007dd-HX; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:49:42 +0200 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:49:42 +0200 From: Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#327459: rekall build failure Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-GPG-Fingerprint: A479 A824 265C B2A5 FC54 8D1E DE4B DA2C 54FD 2A58 Organization: glandium.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 1.1.15-1 On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:32:47PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI, the package rekall also fails to build on several architectures in > a manner strikingly similar to the one discussed here: > > http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=rekall I believe this is fixed with libxslt 1.1.15. I'll try to check out deeper to see what was happening. I think that's related to the fact that libxslt is playing with libxml2 internals it shouldn't play with... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]