Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:05:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in upload of libgsf 1.12.3-2 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 22:38:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 15:38:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEaTO-0003BK-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:38:54 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2005 22:38:22 -0000
Received: from dsl-084-056-070-021.arcor-ip.net (EHLO localhost) [84.56.70.21]
by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 12 Sep 2005 00:38:22 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1545045
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 53765C2D89; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 01:01:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 01:01:16 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: missing dependency on gconf2
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: libgsf-1
Version: 1.12.2-1
Tags: experimental
Severity: serious
Setting up libgsf-1 (1.12.3-1) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libgsf-1.postinst: line 9: gconftool-2: command not found
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libgsf-1.postinst: line 9: gconftool-2: command not found
dpkg: error processing libgsf-1 (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgsf-1-dev:
libgsf-1-dev depends on libgsf-1 (= 1.12.3-1); however:
Package libgsf-1 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing libgsf-1-dev (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
libgsf-1
libgsf-1-dev
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.5
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages libgsf-1 depends on:
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-8.1 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libxml2 2.6.21-1 GNOME XML library
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime
libgsf-1 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDIhQ7+FmQsCSK63MRAtxVAJ4ioIsJt2o79gTmKbLWvzYDbjhKBgCbBZXt
hfFyoNuILje8fKR8bbiIdvk=
=ohzs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 327760-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 18:05:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 11:05:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from node-072-048.dsl.active24.nl (zensunni.xinara.org)
[217.22.72.48] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEsgW-0005XF-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:05:41 -0700
Received: from ray by zensunni.xinara.org with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EEsgV-0001ex-C9
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:05:39 +0200
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:05:39 +0200
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Processed: Fixed in upload of libgsf 1.12.3-2 to experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Ray at home
X-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable, kernel 2.6.12.6
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:18:11 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > tag 327760 + fixed-in-experimental
> Bug#327760: missing dependency on gconf2
> Tags were: pending confirmed experimental
> Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
--> done; closing accordingly.
Ray
--
It's like Jung said, the unconscious is revealed through the imagery of our
dreams which express our innermost fears and our desires.
Jung said that?
Yeah, I think it was Jung. Either that or Vincent Price. (NX 1.8)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
