On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 02:34:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Apr 16, rleigh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Not sure why udev is broken; it's using both locations from the > > look of things. Maybe something it needs has been written to > > one and it's not present in the other or something? > rm -rf /run/udev/ ffs! > It will not be created again by -2 unless /run really is a tmpfs.
Marco, please read what I wrote. I provided all the detail to show what is needed to reproduce the breakage. If you want any more, I'll provide it. /run really is a tmpfs. udev is broken. ** udev is broken when /run is a tmpfs ** How clearly do I have to say this! This is broken, right now, with 167-2 in unstable. Thanks, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
