On 04/25/2011 02:35 AM, David Claughton wrote:
On 24/04/11 23:45, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 04/25/2011 12:17 AM, David Claughton wrote:

OK, I've applied the patch to the git repo - looks good.  Thanks
 again to you both.


Thanks.

However, you might want to revert the other patch that turned
"pyversions -s" into "pyversions -r". The former allows us to
update the package by a simple binNMU while the latter forces
source changes in the source package.

Regards,


Hmm, I'm not sure I agree.  As we have just seen, graphviz requires
source changes anyway to support a new python version.  Surely all
"pyversions -s" does in this situation is guarantee that the binNMU
will fail, just as it did this time?

I left "pyversions -r" in as it seemed the better approach in this
case. It should mean that transitions are smoother - an OCAML
transition shouldn't come to a grinding halt because a new python
version has been uploaded to the archive!


It's up to you, anyway. Now, graphviz is the last package missing to
complete the OCaml transition. Could you please upload the package? I
can also make the upload if you provide me a .dsc. (or I can NMU, but
I'd prefer to upload your .dsc since it's already fixed in Git).

Cheers,

--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to