Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325945: fixed in muine 0.8.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2005 21:37:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 14:37:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.200] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EAaH6-0004kf-00; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:40 -0700
Received: (qmail 3100 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2005 21:37:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.216.211 
with login)
  by smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 21:37:09 -0000
Received: by triplehelix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id C4BD42A95D6; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: muine
Severity: serious

Hello,

If you're receiving this message, you have a package that depends on one
of the FLAC libraries (libFLAC, libFLAC++, libOggFLAC, libOggFLAC++.)
Once again, the SONAME of the libraries has increased due to an API
transition and you must rebuild your packages.

Please briefly review the upstream API changelog at:

http://flac.sourceforge.net/changelog.html

to check if any of the API changes affect your FLAC-depending package.
In most cases, a simple rebuild will be sufficient to transition. If you
like, you can version the libflac-dev, libflac++-dev, liboggflac-dev,
or liboggflac++-dev build-dependency to (>= 1.1.2-1) to ensure that your
package is autobuilt against the new versions of the libraries.

Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the transition.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and thank you.

-- 
Joshua Kwan

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 325945-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 21:49:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 14:49:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EHTU7-0004BP-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:35 -0700
From: Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325945: fixed in muine 0.8.3-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:35 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: muine
Source-Version: 0.8.3-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
muine, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

muine-plugin-trayicon_0.8.3-7_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/muine/muine-plugin-trayicon_0.8.3-7_all.deb
muine_0.8.3-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/muine/muine_0.8.3-7.diff.gz
muine_0.8.3-7.dsc
  to pool/main/m/muine/muine_0.8.3-7.dsc
muine_0.8.3-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/muine/muine_0.8.3-7_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated muine package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:33:26 +0100
Source: muine
Binary: muine muine-plugin-trayicon
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.8.3-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 muine      - Simple playlist based music player
 muine-plugin-trayicon - TrayIcon Plugin for the Muine music player
Closes: 313965 325945
Changes: 
 muine (0.8.3-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Rebuild against libflac (>=1.1.2) for libflac soname transition
     (Closes: #325945)
   * debian/copyright: The FSF has moved again
   * German PO file corrections already fixed upstream (Closes: #313965)
   * Added patch PlayList.cs.patch for mono 1.1.9 (not yet uploaded)
Files: 
 f86d9532deea8bd68de1cae4a756cddf 1261 gnome optional muine_0.8.3-7.dsc
 43bd73f99ba9b5985e5f534787f0b4a3 6198 gnome optional muine_0.8.3-7.diff.gz
 fb2028c9f5f1614adb734fdd5f653f1c 48782 gnome optional 
muine-plugin-trayicon_0.8.3-7_all.deb
 a79048fdcc2f118cc00b54c009bbcc50 262214 gnome optional muine_0.8.3-7_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDLxN6Q+ySUE9xlVoRAuciAKCOTMDd7G2KfYnbstGu6aTNzQwrUQCdG2rs
W77ZnZmsZ7UdXbCyeFtJwU8=
=6/+9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to