> I just wanted to mention, that there is a difference between
>
> *kfreebsd*-yes (my proposed patch)
> and
> *freebsd*-yes (what was merged upstream [1])
>
> afaik the freebsds don't use the glibc userland and I'm not sure if
> the thread libs on freebsd behave like the one on kfreebsd, so I
> just wanted to verify that what you merged upstream is intentional
> and the missing 'k' is not an oversight.
I'm not sure: upstream did that patch independently of yours, and I
saw it looked about the same and blindly merged it.
I'm CCing this message to upstream to let it be addressed directly.
But I will close with a parenthetical grouse: isn't this exactly the
sort of tedious system-by-system manual non-future-proof groveling
that autotools is supposed to abolish? Could this be tested
automatically using existing autoconf macros?
--Barak.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
