> > binutils-2.15 has this in include/opcodes/hppa.h:
> > { "fdc", 0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, "cZx(s,b)", pa10, 0},
> > { "fdc", 0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, "cZx(b)", pa10, 0},
> > { "fic", 0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, "cZx(S,b)", pa10, 0},
> > { "fic", 0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, "cZx(b)", pa10, 0},
>
> The last "fic" opcode entry is wrong. It's using the wrong
> instruction format, the mask is wrong, pa10 is wrong, etc.
The enclosed patch against binutils head adds the missing "fic"
entry. I also noticed that we were missing a pa20 im5 variant for
"fdc". This builds and checks with no regressions. However,
the new entries aren't really tested.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
Index: hppa.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/include/opcode/hppa.h,v
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -u -3 -p -r1.59 hppa.h
--- hppa.h 3 Aug 2005 15:08:52 -0000 1.59
+++ hppa.h 25 Sep 2005 01:58:35 -0000
@@ -755,6 +755,9 @@ static const struct pa_opcode pa_opcodes
{ "pdc", 0x04001380, 0xfc003fdf, "cZx(s,b)", pa10, 0},
{ "fdc", 0x04001280, 0xfc00ffdf, "cZx(b)", pa10, 0},
{ "fdc", 0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, "cZx(s,b)", pa10, 0},
+{ "fdc", 0x04003280, 0xfc00ffff, "5(b)", pa20, FLAG_STRICT},
+{ "fdc", 0x04003280, 0xfc003fff, "5(s,b)", pa20, FLAG_STRICT},
+{ "fic", 0x040013c0, 0xfc00dfdf, "cZx(b)", pa20, FLAG_STRICT},
{ "fic", 0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, "cZx(S,b)", pa10, 0},
{ "fdce", 0x040012c0, 0xfc00ffdf, "cZx(b)", pa10, 0},
{ "fdce", 0x040012c0, 0xfc003fdf, "cZx(s,b)", pa10, 0},
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
