Alexander Sack wrote: > You still fail to give reasons why MPL is non-free. I don't see that. > > Yes, its not gpl-compatible, but again, that is not the same as non-free.
debian-legal has some problems with the license, it is not clearly stated that it is 100% DFSG-compliant, therefore, if it is not 100% it remains non-free (to my understanding; affects joice-of-venue and patent clause mainly). As least to my knowledge, there were no 'official' statement about results of the investigations MJR did. So there is no (not yet?) final decision. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
