I demand that Aurelien Jarno may or may not have written...
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 06:12:28PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
[snip]
>> debian/patches is generated when the source package is built, and that
>> patch adds one file and alters another in that directory.
[snip]
> Rebuilding the package from source doesn't change anything in
> debian/patches/* .
Rebuilding from the source package != rebuilding the source package.
>> Either we find some way to deal with that or I'm going to have to pretend
>> that this NMU never happened. The best that I can think of is to directly
>> apply the patch file and leave debian/patches empty.
> I am fine with either options, as long as the bugs are not reintroduced.
Ideally, I'd be able to apply the NMU patch as is and be able to build an
effectively identical source package from the repository. The 'best' option
merely provides something which is functionally equivalent... not really what
I want, but it'll have to do, I think.
--
| Darren Salt | linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | _ ASCII ribbon
| using Debian | youmustbejoking | Northumberland | ( ) campaign against
| GNU/Linux | ,demon,co,uk | | X HTML e-mail
/ \ www.asciiribbon.org
Taglines borrowed and recycled here. Give generously...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
