On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:14:59 +0100, Robert Millan <r...@debian.org> wrote: > 2011/11/10 Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com>: > > Out of curiosity, how could this possibly lead you to believe that > > 'grave' is an appropriate severity for this bug report? I would have > > thought 'minor' more appropriate, personally. > > It's unusable for all users on a release architecture.
Ok, I see where you're coming from, but I disagree. That is clearly not the same as 'makes the package in question unusable or mostly so", and is in fact no different than any other case in which a package builds and is useful on some but not all architectures. If it weren't so easy to "fix" the underlying complaint, I'd re-prioritize this as 'minor' on the basis of it being "a problem which doesn't affect the package's usefulness", particularly since I don't know of anyone who actually wants to use the package that this affects today. [shrug] Bdale
pgpLBS8xS2PZZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
