On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 14:10:32 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for mach (versioned as 0.9.1-3.1). The diff
> is attached to this message.
>
> Regards.
>
> diff -u mach-0.9.1/debian/changelog mach-0.9.1/debian/changelog
> --- mach-0.9.1/debian/changelog
> +++ mach-0.9.1/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
> +mach (0.9.1-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> + * Non-maintainer upload.
> + * Fix FTBFS caused by set, but unused variable with the patch by Peter
> + Green (Closes: #625381)
> + * Urgency set to medium due to rc bug fix
> +
> + -- Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <toli...@debian.org> Sun, 04 Dec 2011
> 14:02:51 +0100
> +
> mach (0.9.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Wrap build-deps and deps.
> only in patch2:
> unchanged:
> --- mach-0.9.1.orig/src/mach-helper.c
> +++ mach-0.9.1/src/mach-helper.c
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
> [0] = "PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin",
> [1] = "HOME=/root"
> };
> - int retval;
> + //int retval;
> size_t idx=2;
> size_t i;
> char *envvar;
eww. Why not just drop it rather than this ugly C++ comment?
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
> env[idx++] = ptr;
> }
>
> - retval = execve (filename, argv, env);
> + execve (filename, argv, env);
> error ("executing %s: %s", filename, strerror (errno));
> }
>
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
