Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please take it under advisement that I am currently trying to persuade > Thomas that the gdk-imlib11-dev and gdk-imlib11 packages should be abandoned > in favor of reintroduction of gdk-imlib1 and gdk-imlib1-dev as > libpng12-based packages. I know a couple of you have already uploaded your > packages to fix these bugs, which if all goes according to plan means you > will have to *re*upload shortly to revert this change, sorry. For the rest > of you, I would suggest that you hold off on implementing this change until > Thomas and I come to some sort of agreement.
This is sadly FUD. Re-uploading is certainly unnecessary because whatever happens, gdk-imlib11-dev will continue to be provided. > One way or another, I do intend to reintroduce gdk-imlib1 and gdk-imlib1-dev > to etch based on libpng12-0, so unless your package depends on libpng10-0 > directly, you shouldn't need to reupload your package for the png > transition. Even if this is shown to be wrong? Steve: can you please stop spamming everyone with each message this way? Instead, please respond to my messages directly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
