On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:18:46PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > I think at least some of this should go to debian-devel-announce. I'm not > sure if we should send the entire ruling there, or select bits and pieces > of it, but at least the testing part probably needs to reach a broader > audience. > > Do we have a past precedent for how we handle publicizing tech-ctte > decisions?
FWIW, I'll surely mention this in my next "bits from the DPL" mail, but it won't happen before early March. Also, I expect that when the upload happens [1] the uploader to send a wide call for testing to d-d-a. This is just to say that I don't think we should fear people will overlook the practical impact of the decisions. However, the idea of systematically announcing tech-ctte decisions to d-d-a (hinted by your last paragraph) seems a very good one to me. Please do :-) Cheers. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2012/02/msg00010.html -- Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o . Maître de conférences ...... http://upsilon.cc/zack ...... . . o Debian Project Leader ....... @zack on identi.ca ....... o o o « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature